Replies to post #20174 on 4Cable TV International Inc (CATV)

[starstx]

Not really ... all the doc states is the case would go to a grand jury ... which would be required of any case. The Fed charges against Svorai would have to go to a Grand Jury who would decide based on evidence whether to indict etc.

Yet on the document on the USA vs Svorai case I posted a link to ... the Government upon allowing his release specifically states that the USA vs Vaccaro case is unrelated to this case.

The multiple names thing you mention is not what I am referring to.

Case 20cr00392 is USA vs Vaccaro from the 2017 to 2019 scam not involving CATV. That is listed 6 times for the 6 defendants that have been indicted. It also ties in the associated cases 19mj03190 and 19mj03191 which were USA vs Svorai and USA vs Vaccaro from 2019 associated with the 2020 case.

Then we have 21mj02340 USA vs Svorai where Svorai is the only defendant in Florida Southern District. And 21mj02054 which is USA vs Svorai in the Ohio Northern District. This is the Svorai scheme related to the Feb 17, 2021 complaint that lists CATV.

There are NO associated cases and the document pertaining to his release signed off on by the Feds specifically states ... although odd they fought him being released from March to May 2021 and then did an about face and were completely fine with releasing him ... so that would also assume they were no longer worried about any type of threat or gain he couod make financially which would mean CATV should have been allowed to continue trading as there is no public interest concern or the Feds would not have let him out ...

At any rate ... the document states regarding his release and I quote It should be noted that a seperate, pre-existing 1M secured bond remains in effect in an unrelated case pending in the Northern District of Ohio Case #20-392

There is no spinning that one. Maybe you were confused since there are multiple cases and there was a seperate Svorai/Vaccaro Case in the same district pertaining to the 2017 to 2019 scheme which did not involve CATV. Seperate and unrelated specifically stated in the court document filed 05-21-21.

Try explaining that one. Link below to screenshot I yook of documeny and posted on ST. Not sure how to post it here but it is on Pacer under the USA vs Svorai case from 2021

http://stocktwits.com/starstx/message/453194041

[starstx]

There are so many holes in this I do not even know where to begin. I also hate having to correct people that post things as facts that they are unable to support or backup.

As the U.S. attorney indicated to the judge back in 2021 at Svorai bond hearing — he was transferring the CATV case to the grand jury, which was done in July 2021.

The document only states in the US vs Svorai case 21- which is a seperate and different case that it was being bound over to the Grand Jury. Anytime the government brings charges it has to go to a Grand Jury who then decides on the evidence. It does not state anything about being part of the 2019 and 2020 case seperate case number. You made an assumption. But no document or facts support it.

CATV case is now part of the grand jury case, which all the defendants, unnamed co-conspirators, and multiple entities directly named or not have the same case number. So, whether it says U.S. v. Vaccaro, or Svorai, or Hagen, or others, they have the same case, and unless there’s a motion that specifically involves one of the individuals, the main highlights appear for the most part on all the dockets (if it’s approved by the judge to be released to the public) which is one in the same. This is not as difficult as you’re making it, it’s rather straightforward

Again ... nothing states this case is being added to the other case. You seem to be confused. There is a case listed 6 times for each defendant 20- that has associated cases 19-03191 and 03190 included. That case is USA vs Vaccarro and then lists the defendant after it. 6 cases. Same case number. With each defendant's name. One being Svorai.

You fail to acknowledge the USA vs Svorai case 21 is a seperate case and shows no associated cases nor is it terminated. Furthermore, in the document filed to the Court in late May it is explicitly stated despite your assertion and assumptions that the USA vs Svorai case is UNRELATED to the USA vs Vacarro case you keep referencing where Vacarro is a defendant.

Whether you want to acknowledge this or not ... or perhaps backup your claims or assumptions with something more concrete than your words ...

You are right about one thing ... facts are facts.

It is not a vast conspiracy ... I am just posting what anyone can look up and verify ... surely someone as adept as yourself can tell their are clearly different case numbers and read the document I posted that states the cases are unrelated. I understand it can be confusing ... and you may be confused so if you need help sorting it out ... let me know.

I will wait for an explanation on my last post where I lay out the cases in Pacer and link to the document where it states that the 2021 case is not related to the 2019/20 Vaccaro/Svorai case.

That is not subjective. That is not an opinion. If you still feel you are right ... then surely you can post proof or something more than your subjective opinion. Your claim that well ... it went to a grand jury so that means it is part of the 2019/20 case when that is not what Pacer or any court documents is showing ... burden of proof is on you and that is far from some conspiracy theory. Prove me wrong ... and I will admit it ... but I am uet to find anything that shows what you are saying or supports your claim.