News Focus
News Focus
icon url

TonyJoe1957

04/13/22 10:55 AM

#94062 RE: geejay #94061

Court custodianship and claw back, where appropriate, is desirable.
Stay well.
icon url

TonyJoe1957

04/13/22 11:55 AM

#94063 RE: geejay #94061

Hoping Billy did not contract with law firms and others to commit fraud against UOIP Shareholders, but think he may have. I guess it will take time to unravel the tale. I wonder if attorneys can be disbarred for this kind of stuff. You know. Engaging in fraud for personal gain and stuff like that. Do they do treble (or triple) damages for stuff like that? No biggie if you have malpractice insurance, since they can pay the bill, but career and family name is kaput. I would love to take this case on a contingency and build an incredible name for myself that would ensure the generation of revenues for decades. In the interim, UOIP Shareholders can say "GO TEAM!"

PS: Law firms engaged in fraud can cite me on this.
icon url

imp82

04/16/22 9:04 AM

#94141 RE: geejay #94061

A shareholder is a shareholder is a shareholder. A judge would only award attorney fees, maybe interest, as a refund. They have no authority to reclassify.