That's what I meant by implicit - when one buys stock, certain things are assumed, same as when a company SELLS stock to shareholders. Once the company sells stock, ownership is shared, not exclusive to the company and the company has an obligation to the shareholders - actually a bunch of obligations. The idea that a company could legally issue and sell shares of a company owning specific assets (patents) and then enter into legal action to protect/enforce those patents but then just - well - somehow FORGET that there are hundreds of millions of outstanding shares of the companies stock.....just strains credibility. I hope the judge can see that.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
