That's what I meant by implicit - when one buys stock, certain things are assumed, same as when a company SELLS stock to shareholders. Once the company sells stock, ownership is shared, not exclusive to the company and the company has an obligation to the shareholders - actually a bunch of obligations. The idea that a company could legally issue and sell shares of a company owning specific assets (patents) and then enter into legal action to protect/enforce those patents but then just - well - somehow FORGET that there are hundreds of millions of outstanding shares of the companies stock.....just strains credibility. I hope the judge can see that.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.