LOL, like LAST filing re: carter ? PALTRY, laughable ~ 2% is really SOMETHING hahaha ___________________________________________
Therefore, the only arguably viable amount Plaintiff (deirdre leane) could recover under an Unjust Enrichment theory is the $6,000.00 referenced above, which, again, is approximately 2% of the principal amount Plaintiff seeks to recover.
15. Defendant has periodically acknowledged the validity of the debt he owes Plaintiff, as well as the amount owed. Defendant did not object ordispute the amount then owed. b. On or about 7 August 2017, Defendant sent a text message to Plaintiff asking for an additional loan of $5,000.00 USD; Plaintiff responded to Defendant that his then-balance owed was over $240,000.00 USD. In response, Defendant texted “I understand” and renewed his promise to repay Plaintiff.
Therefore, the only arguably viable amount Plaintiff could recover under her claims for Action on Open Accountand/or Breach of Contract is the $6,000.00 referenced above, (approximately 2% of the $283,452.94 which Plaintiff seeks to recover). (See Dkt. 1 Compl. ¶ 26).
Market Data 
Markets 
