InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 30
Posts 2062
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/20/2019

Re: zombywolf post# 93498

Thursday, 03/17/2022 1:50:50 PM

Thursday, March 17, 2022 1:50:50 PM

Post# of 96905
re: "appears she won something"

LOL, like LAST filing re: carter ? PALTRY, laughable ~ 2% is really SOMETHING hahaha
___________________________________________

Therefore, the only arguably viable amount Plaintiff (deirdre leane) could recover under an Unjust Enrichment theory is the $6,000.00 referenced above, which, again, is approximately 2% of the principal amount Plaintiff seeks to recover.

15. Defendant has periodically acknowledged the validity of the debt he owes Plaintiff, as well as the amount owed. Defendant did not object ordispute the amount then owed. b. On or about 7 August 2017, Defendant sent a text message to Plaintiff asking for an additional loan of $5,000.00 USD; Plaintiff responded to Defendant that his then-balance owed was over $240,000.00 USD. In response, Defendant texted “I understand” and renewed his promise to repay Plaintiff.

Therefore, the only arguably viable amount Plaintiff could recover under her claims for Action on Open Accountand/or Breach of Contract is the $6,000.00 referenced above, (approximately 2% of the $283,452.94 which Plaintiff seeks to recover). (See Dkt. 1 Compl. ¶ 26).

https://www.scribd.com/document/529224801/3488197-0-103314

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.