Don't worry. I saved a copy of the timeline web site you created so it can get the attention it deserves at the proper time. Cheerleaders have come and gone over the years, and there have been similar timelines created in the past pointing to guaranteed positive data being released imminently - I remember a fairly lengthy one someone posted in 2017 or so. But the one thing these timelines have in common is that they never amount to anything. No data is ever released. It's all for show. All part of the game, and keeps a few folks hanging on while the company execs spend their most recent $15 million money raise on themselves. Until it's time for the next money raise.
All the complicated analysis and due diligence can't seem to get past one simple fact, which is that companies with positive data don't sit on that data. Never have and never will. It just doesn't make any sense. It's almost as if the people who do all this complicated analysis and due diligence, the same people who come up with all these excuses for why a company unblinded since at least Oct. 5, 2020 still hasn't released top line data, have never stopped for one minute to ponder why a company would sit on positive, efficacious trial data for more than a year. Because the obvious answer is that no company ever would. Those people cannot process what it means when a company promises TLD three times in 2020, then announces they locked the data and became unblinded on Oct. 5, 2020, and then we don't hear another word about the data for more than 15 months. Somehow they think that's a positive thing?! The company got a look at the data and suddenly turtles up into a shell of silence for 15 months and counting, and that's a good thing? I mean, what do you think they saw when they looked at the data? Because it sure wasn't anything positive or efficacious! To argue otherwise is pure stupidity.
The people who are running this company have been lying to shareholders for a long, long time. It was pretty funny that this morning someone posted the lawsuit from 2007 when the company lied about the status of DCVax-L in Switzerland. That lie was specifically intended to boost the share price, which it did. And that episode did not deter them in the least because they have made multiple false statements since (everyone should come to the shareholder meeting. It's going to be interesting!) (We anticipate the release of top line data by June/July/September 2020) that have also boosted the share price right around the time they were about to announce another money raise and handing out warrants like candy. This is all a game. If you were to define a shareholder scam, how would it look any different than this? It would look exactly like this. If I were you I would be careful about getting caught up in what is coming next, because when the lawsuits start flying it's not going to be pleasant for anyone at NWBO or anyone who has been doing their bidding. That little web site you created is going to come in handy!
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
