InvestorsHub Logo

Basin Street Blues

09/14/21 8:20 AM

#401861 RE: BWIS #401859

No institutional ownership means no one to hold them to account , and by god they`ve abused that one for sure ...

biosectinvestor

09/14/21 8:38 AM

#401864 RE: BWIS #401859

60+ eminent doctors put their name and their institutions behind it and did not have to do that. It’s not BS as much as that comment suggests some might like it to be.

Yes, if bought out, we get an immediate substantial price and often companies with new products settle in a range for a while before they rocket further, nothing unusual or bad about that. They also can often be given a value based upon their potential, even absent revenues. It just depends on a variety of market circumstances and conditions. The reality is, if approved, DCVax has incredible potential value and everyone will know it regardless.

anders2211

09/14/21 8:48 AM

#401869 RE: BWIS #401859

I'm betting maybe 2 or 3 actually had anything more than minimal input and 50+ did nothing more than read it.



You sure hold a low opinion of these medical professionals, hope for you your MD isnt like that.


When they finally get their data out, it will probably be a base hit or "C", definitely not a Grand Slam or "A+"



No I believe it will be a grand slam
a. NWBO has only recently (as far as I know) introduced the notion L will become SOC. At least they have not distanced themselves from it
b. The remaining question is will L be granted rGBM as well? In there IMO lies the waiting for journal publication. If nGBM was the only thing they were going after they could have made a simple TLD a year ago telling the world we have this number of OS it means this for mOS and this for this number of years for OS etc etc can we have approval now for nGBM. Nope they didn't and the reason is IMO that they are going after rGBM as well and to get approval for that a lot of explaining needs to be done hence the publication.

Similar to AMRN.


Nope x8-10 bigger than AMRN in terms of MC.