Replies to post #693730 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Achilles deFlandres]

This, along with the books being sealed similarly have baffled me forever. Theories

1. Maybe the bailoutnwas necessary after all
2. High level attorneys have obligations also. I remember Someone from Cooper and Kirk golfing with Obama....maybe rules of engagement?
3. Mayybe they all have to run to first base for appearances but the fix is and has been in.

[ano]

It is harder to get relief from provisions that breach each other than single provisions that fail per the constitution itself,(4617(a)(6) does not breach the constitution itself, only in combination with) the plaintiff just went for the easiest ones I guess

The point you bring 12 U.S. Code § 4617(a)(6) conflicts with 12 U.S.C. § 4617(f) however is correct and should fail as a matter of law too, as the government cannot take fiduciary duty from the board to become untouchable themselves without paying just compensation

IMO when the old BOD was indemnified from suits for a breach of fiduciary duty to shareholders by da Gooberment for agreeing to an unnecesary Conservatorship an obvious circumstancial evidence was born that the sealing of financial documents and minutes of the board meeting provide no more than a transparently thin veil. For some odd reason most Plaintiffs prefer to ignore the evidence behind that transparent curtain skipping instead to the NWS. Any ideas why?