Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[ano]

It is harder to get relief from provisions that breach each other than single provisions that fail per the constitution itself,(4617(a)(6) does not breach the constitution itself, only in combination with) the plaintiff just went for the easiest ones I guess

The point you bring 12 U.S. Code § 4617(a)(6) conflicts with 12 U.S.C. § 4617(f) however is correct and should fail as a matter of law too, as the government cannot take fiduciary duty from the board to become untouchable themselves without paying just compensation

IMO when the old BOD was indemnified from suits for a breach of fiduciary duty to shareholders by da Gooberment for agreeing to an unnecesary Conservatorship an obvious circumstancial evidence was born that the sealing of financial documents and minutes of the board meeting provide no more than a transparently thin veil. For some odd reason most Plaintiffs prefer to ignore the evidence behind that transparent curtain skipping instead to the NWS. Any ideas why?