Posts like this prove why facts matter and BS doesn't.
"Those that bought for the dividend"? So, you think there are many who bought PHIL just to get dividend shares, and didn't buy PHIL for other reasons as well?
If they sell because of it, they should be sued for stupidity, but to sue PHIL for loss in stock price and dividend, when there has been no loss in stock price and no lost dividend, is beyond absurd.
Your opinion, about our genius CEO's business move, is clearly not based on this:
"Regarding the change in the APR dividend ratio, it is necessary due to pending transactions, a more realistic capital structure and anticipated value of the APR shares, which should make more sense for our shareholders and all stakeholders. Think strategically."
I think someone wants in cheaper.