InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

janice shell

05/13/21 6:24 PM

#1676 RE: Garden Rose #1673

I won't not because I am anti-vax, I simply know that I have no need for it when I can use hydroxy or ivermectin and prefer to develop my own immunity.

WHAT? How do you propose to develop your "own immunity"? Something tells me you do not understand what "herd immunity" is, and how it works.

Have you considered the possibility that you wouldn't be able to get a script for ivermectin unless you had ringworm? Or hydroxychloroquine unless you had malaria, lupus, or RA?
icon url

DragonBear

05/14/21 9:12 AM

#1730 RE: Garden Rose #1673

I won't not because I am anti-vax, I simply know that I have no need for it when I can use hydroxy or ivermectin and prefer to develop my own immunity.

GL on that approach due to many reasons...

Neither does the idea Ivermectin is protecting me, therefore it's allowing me to develop "my own immunity" have any validity. First, if Ivermectin was protecting you, wiping out Covid, then your immune system wouldn't recognize it was infected, and mount an immune response. Then again, there's no evidence Ivermectin has any efficacy against Covid.

JAMA

The only reason, you have not come down with Covid is because you have not been exposed to it. If you believe otherwise, then get your Dr to order a sero test for Covid Abs. It will come back negative.

The only thing protecting you, has been asymptomatic carriers of Covid being required to wear masks. Preventing them from exhaling aerosols of Covid particles into the air, for you to breath in. Along with the vaccinated wearing masks, where there is currently no evidence the vaccinated can be carriers with detectable virus. Well guess what has happened in the last 24 hrs...

CDC now recommends those vaccinated don't need to wear masks inside/outside. Outside of the kooks who believe the vaccinated are shedding toxic skin cells requiring masks, the rest of the anti-VAX crowd will feel outrage, and prosecution: "Why should only the un-vaccinated have to continue to wear masks indoors!?". The only ones left wearing a mask will be the still frightened immuno compromised (N92 mask please). Where they do have cause to remain frightened. Along with the kiddies.

In another words you are entering a dangerous time. Currently 40% fully immunized. Another 20% with only 1 jab, making them potential short term carriers until their 2nd jab. The kiddie population 12-15 yrs old still wearing masks. The rest unvaccinated not wearing masks free to cough/sneeze/spit/whatever, passing the virus around, and infecting each other. You will no longer have a masked up population for protection against infection.

So do keep taking the "unproven" Ivermectin. And make an effort to go out in public as much as you can. Covid will find you.

BTW - what is the established dose for Ivermectin protecting against Covid infection (even though it can't)? Answer: There is no establish dose. Also, for all of those lab in vitro studies with Ivermectin against Covid, the equivalent mg/kg dose in humans would be toxic. Thus, your Dr gives you a low dose of Ivermectin, and sends you on your way.