hk-the sad fact is: as much you posit that fraud is a clear--the judicial system--for fairness must allow the other side-being accused of fraud to defend itself--that is the american way, right?
And du is correct on this point, that introducing fraud NOW (and not when we begged amrn to bring it during appeal) makes it harder (biased) for the defendants to answer the charge, witnesses forget, would have done things different... (although they are probably guilty).
Makes sense?
Bottom line although marj did a wonderful job--yet since the...management at amrn didn't bring fraud and mistake when batt PUBLISHED it for some non sensical reason--even in the appeal it will be EXTREMELY HARD to get passed the standing issue--because of bias.
The best chance is the infringement case imo.
9