News Focus
News Focus
icon url

postes

05/03/21 11:54 AM

#338228 RE: eightisenough #338225

8/9....certainly the statute of limitations is not 1 year on fraud....Marjac/HK should be in contact with DOJ...if there is a criminal act it needs to be pursued.
icon url

Meowza

05/03/21 12:44 PM

#338242 RE: eightisenough #338225

for the defendants to answer the charge, witnesses forget

Then let them so answer, if that's truly the case.
icon url

HinduKush

05/04/21 9:40 AM

#338401 RE: eightisenough #338225

Eight
I understand your point and thank you for your insight. Here is my question:
If the rule 60 petition had alleged catastrophic error ie mistake (and not fraud), would you say the same?
In the issue of standing and bias, how do you see this-please explain?

management at amrn didn't bring fraud and mistake when batt PUBLISHED it for some non sensical reason-


On this, I entirely agree. I personally pleaded with Thero from the time of Bhatt's publication several times--he declined to intervene on grounds of counsel's advice (presumably of futility, though I can hazard a guess to other considerations)
on this I totally agree:

The best chance is the infringement case imo.