It was basically another Rule 36 but with comments.
From what you said it seems like she sounded stupider explaining than not explaining at all.
Someone that pompous never looks in the mirror.
To say nothing presented would change the outcome reflects an omnipotent attitude. But in reality it is merely a weak attempt to rationalize her arbutrary position.
I hope she is forced to see her conclusions reversed. But doubt that it would have any impact.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
