Replies to post #333001 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[marjac]

This part has already been rebutted in Point III of the Rule 24 Brief. We will reiterate those authorities in the Reply Brief

[Meowza]

“a claim or defense that shares with the main action a common question of law or fact,”

Ok

EPADI II admits it is “not . . . raising new causes of action”

Didn't the first quote require a common issue, not a new one?

instead “stand[s] on Amarin’s pleadings already on file.”

Again, refer to first quote. Where's the beef?