Replies to post #343916 on NorthWest Biotherapeutics Inc (NWBO)

[biosectinvestor]

It’s not personal for me Dan. I’m making a broader point as I do not want to see this flawed reasoning on other boards. Which will surely happen the more people make it seem to be that back letter law is validating their investments for them.

No doubt the fraud rules apply, but that is a case, with uncertain outcomes and dependent upon the interpretation of actual, not hypothesized, facts and circumstances. It’s not a rule. So rationalizing an investment from a rule that is not applicable, is not logical.

It doesn’t mean there are not a broad range of indirect details and circumstances that suggest failure is not likely. I think people got determined to justify a rationale because it makes it seem easier. We all like easier. But I just don’t want to see people misled on this where the other circumstances are less encouraging.

[anders2211]

I am joining you in your conclusion Dan88

[Doc logic]

Dan88,

When a bull like biosectinvestor and a bear like exwannabe agree I believe it is worth paying attention to even if someone might feel like they have reason to disagree strongly. Not taking sides here as I am no expert in legal matters but I do feel that NWBO would be in hot water if they had results indicating failure to reach specified endpoints and were refusing to disclose them based on subjective hopes. Anyway, this is not a point worth getting upset over in my opinion. There are still those 17 missing SOC/placebo patients from this trial and their absence speaks loud and clear to me. Best wishes.