InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 195
Posts 24711
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/03/2010

Re: Dan88 post# 343916

Thursday, 12/31/2020 8:41:58 AM

Thursday, December 31, 2020 8:41:58 AM

Post# of 701778
It’s not personal for me Dan. I’m making a broader point as I do not want to see this flawed reasoning on other boards. Which will surely happen the more people make it seem to be that back letter law is validating their investments for them.

No doubt the fraud rules apply, but that is a case, with uncertain outcomes and dependent upon the interpretation of actual, not hypothesized, facts and circumstances. It’s not a rule. So rationalizing an investment from a rule that is not applicable, is not logical.

It doesn’t mean there are not a broad range of indirect details and circumstances that suggest failure is not likely. I think people got determined to justify a rationale because it makes it seem easier. We all like easier. But I just don’t want to see people misled on this where the other circumstances are less encouraging.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News