News Focus
News Focus
icon url

CantonG

05/14/20 5:51 PM

#191629 RE: PatentGuy1 #191628

Great post. Agree with your assertions.
icon url

jrs5

05/14/20 6:02 PM

#191630 RE: PatentGuy1 #191628

Completely disagree. There did NOT need to be any material change to remove the POTENTIAL conflict of interest language that had been reported in the prior three reports. They specifically stated "POTENTIAL" because they did not know from a legal stand point. So they covered themselves until they received a legal opinion regarding the topic. And obviously, the legal opinion showed that there were no potential conflicts of interest, so they removed the language.
icon url

Almosthere

05/14/20 8:49 PM

#191634 RE: PatentGuy1 #191628

Totally disagree. Read jrs response. He is right on track and echoes my sentiments exactly!
icon url

Eagle1947

05/15/20 4:55 PM

#191681 RE: PatentGuy1 #191628

Of course they are !

Can't be stressed enough that the folks in LF are "do nothings", always have been and always will be .... Hard to imagine the conversations between them and Li if he even cares one iota about what they do ...

Why would a smart man put in $64M and then settle for nothing ??? Too bad this is a mystery that will never be solved.