InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 17
Posts 1698
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/26/2014

Re: PatentGuy1 post# 191628

Thursday, 05/14/2020 6:02:32 PM

Thursday, May 14, 2020 6:02:32 PM

Post# of 232551
Completely disagree. There did NOT need to be any material change to remove the POTENTIAL conflict of interest language that had been reported in the prior three reports. They specifically stated "POTENTIAL" because they did not know from a legal stand point. So they covered themselves until they received a legal opinion regarding the topic. And obviously, the legal opinion showed that there were no potential conflicts of interest, so they removed the language.