It’s been proven through reference to legal filings that THE SENIOR ACCOUNTANT for the SEC (Robert Shapiro) has stated that DBMM is materially deficient, directly because of missing 10Q numbers, never seen from delinquent 10Q filings.
Because the filing of these missing 10Q numbers has NEVER BEEN SEEN TO DATE, DBMM remains materially deficient.
It cannot BE ANY CLEARER.
This material deficiency CANNOT be solved by any “language corrections” made by DBMM. The deficiencies that the SEC said were corrected was in reference to the ICFR language in the original “Super 10K”. It was taken care of in the amended filing.
Suddenly, Fritz produces correspondence that says “all deficiencies” are taken care of?
It is IMPOSSIBLE to take care of a MATERIAL DEFICIENCY caused by missing 10Q numbers with “Language changes”.
It is irrelevant that some minor “liaison” says otherwise.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
