News Focus
News Focus
Followers 54
Posts 17539
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 01/11/2004

Re: AKsquared post# 200578

Friday, 02/28/2020 7:49:13 AM

Friday, February 28, 2020 7:49:13 AM

Post# of 370409
It’s been proven through reference to legal filings that THE SENIOR ACCOUNTANT for the SEC (Robert Shapiro) has stated that DBMM is materially deficient, directly because of missing 10Q numbers, never seen from delinquent 10Q filings.

Because the filing of these missing 10Q numbers has NEVER BEEN SEEN TO DATE, DBMM remains materially deficient.

It cannot BE ANY CLEARER.

This material deficiency CANNOT be solved by any “language corrections” made by DBMM. The deficiencies that the SEC said were corrected was in reference to the ICFR language in the original “Super 10K”. It was taken care of in the amended filing.

Suddenly, Fritz produces correspondence that says “all deficiencies” are taken care of?

It is IMPOSSIBLE to take care of a MATERIAL DEFICIENCY caused by missing 10Q numbers with “Language changes”.

It is irrelevant that some minor “liaison” says otherwise.




I keep telling myself....deep breath....count to ten....try to answer without personal attack...if available, always try to present fact to back up your opinion.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent DBMM News