InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

kabunushi

01/07/20 10:44 AM

#258656 RE: iwasadiver #258639

Thanks Diver! There's always a great risk of confirmation bias but I still think it's very valuable to read your view and as a clinician and word of mouth info about what oncologists are saying.

Also thanks to Umibe san for raising the level of dialogue on the MB well above the normal level.
icon url

hyperopia

01/07/20 11:41 AM

#258675 RE: iwasadiver #258639

Nice post iwasadiver. Thanks!
icon url

Umibe5690

01/07/20 11:32 PM

#258758 RE: iwasadiver #258639

Thank you very much for your response. Very well articulated and logical as well as objective. Should give all frustrated and nervous longs welcome confidence. Best of luck to all.
icon url

marzan

01/08/20 7:25 AM

#258767 RE: iwasadiver #258639

iwasadiver, I like all your points here, especially number 4 discussing FDA 's latest guidance and DcVax probable role in drafting this guidance. Do you think rather or more the SAP as well played a role in drafting this guidance by FDA? If it was the SAP, then bingo I think FDA has already given their blessings for L approval, imo. The way Ragos listed the favorable L efficacy evidences in his twit, looks like very exciting times are ahead!