News Focus
News Focus
icon url

lesnshawn

12/03/06 10:28 AM

#138755 RE: Jagman #138753

Jagman: Point being, it has YET to be proved that the bonds in question are NOT as RPH&Company originally stated.

"That's the fact, JACK!"

lns
icon url

vozmil

12/03/06 10:38 AM

#138757 RE: Jagman #138753

'Jagman' my question is, if it was a like a stollen car and SEC was successful to recover the stollen property then why the same court allow it to be traded as a gunuine public company, only in a different exchange? Shouldn't court just suspend such scam once for all and put the perpetrator of such frauds behind the bar?