News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Tuslog28

11/29/06 10:57 PM

#197310 RE: Stock H.O.G. #197296

H.O.G.: you rock. tks. em
icon url

FrankieJ

11/29/06 11:17 PM

#197320 RE: Stock H.O.G. #197296

That's the way I read it too HOG, good post.
icon url

golfndude

11/29/06 11:24 PM

#197324 RE: Stock H.O.G. #197296

Well said HOG !!!!
icon url

Trish0949

11/29/06 11:32 PM

#197328 RE: Stock H.O.G. #197296

Stock H.O.G.

Although the PR was very confusing to some of us and lacks alot of clarity, you have decifered this in a way that most of us can understand. I value your opinions.

Thanks
icon url

Kblog

11/29/06 11:32 PM

#197329 RE: Stock H.O.G. #197296

Excellent dissection of the article "Hog". You pared off the fluff and bared the meat.
icon url

FrankieJ

11/29/06 11:47 PM

#197336 RE: Stock H.O.G. #197296

Why would they be setting up phone lines with access to the accountants? Could it be they are there to answer questions after the AF release? We were told the language might confuse us. Make any sense?


HOG: I can see sending things to the lawyers, but not sure I understand where the accountants come in with regards to the public.


icon url

prof_farnsworth

11/29/06 11:48 PM

#197337 RE: Stock H.O.G. #197296

Not to throw the baby out with the bathwater as this PR had some decent things in it, but, does anyone find it a little bit odd that he mentions "children" in this paragraph of the PR?:

The Company believes that in five short months, an operation has been built that anyone would be proud of, something for our children to know that our team helped to build, and no one here feels at all different, despite the poorly organized drivel of envious onlookers. These onlookers will become even more diffused as the public observes how stringently the Company adheres to upcoming stricter guidelines and compliance issues set forth on the Pink Sheets and larger exchanges in the near future. We will exceed the minimum requirements of these regulations.

Also, is it just me, or does this sound like Petar wrote that paragraph? I base that thought on his response to the first WS article.

Anyway, I agree with you that Petard, no matter if he's still running the show or not, needs to NOT be mentioned in the PRs.
icon url

metropick

11/30/06 1:01 AM

#197378 RE: Stock H.O.G. #197296

Even after that PR, we still managed to close in the red. Unbelievable. Once they address the AFs directly, we should be much better off. Also, I think it's time to let someone else write the PRs. A couple meandering run-on sentences, poor punctuation, and the superfluous use of The Microsoft Word Thesaurus kind of took away from the total message.