Not to throw the baby out with the bathwater as this PR had some decent things in it, but, does anyone find it a little bit odd that he mentions "children" in this paragraph of the PR?:
The Company believes that in five short months, an operation has been built that anyone would be proud of, something for our children to know that our team helped to build, and no one here feels at all different, despite the poorly organized drivel of envious onlookers. These onlookers will become even more diffused as the public observes how stringently the Company adheres to upcoming stricter guidelines and compliance issues set forth on the Pink Sheets and larger exchanges in the near future. We will exceed the minimum requirements of these regulations.
Also, is it just me, or does this sound like Petar wrote that paragraph? I base that thought on his response to the first WS article.
Anyway, I agree with you that Petard, no matter if he's still running the show or not, needs to NOT be mentioned in the PRs.