News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Golfbum

09/27/03 4:08 PM

#14297 RE: wbmw #14296

re: ingr patents

my guess is that once amd starts showing a profit ingr will give them a look as well.

gb
icon url

chr p

09/27/03 4:27 PM

#14298 RE: wbmw #14296

wbmv, what's the point in going after them?

no point really. It is just Subzero's style that is very contagious as well as your definition of x86-64 :
"if x86 is crap then x86-64 is crap++"
... and it looks like Intel is gonna support crap++. maybe they'll manage to add more pluses after the crap ++ but there are some other opinions too. Ed's Stroligo has tuned down his ego lately and now he sounds much more reasonable:

http://www.overclockers.com/articles841/

regards,
chr
icon url

chipguy

09/28/03 12:06 AM

#14314 RE: wbmw #14296

Chr, Re: Do you remember how much Intel paid Intergraph for some of IA64's advanced features?

$150m IIRC


The intergraph patent was very generalized, and it pretty much applies to most of the CPUs currently in existence. After they finish with Intel, my guess is that they will target IBM. I believe TMTA also infringes on their idea, but what's the point in going after them?


I looked at the two primary patents in question. They
primarily apply to VLIW machines and both clearly apply
to IA64. I thought one of them could have been challenged
on prior art but I am sure Intel would have done so if
there was reasonable grounds.

The obvious Intergraph targets after Intel are TI, Philips,
and Transmeta. IIRC TI recently settled with Intergraph.
Of course it is pointless to go after Transmeta until it
actually starts making some money. ;-)