That was in reply to the sealed letter from the attorney for the 13 in the initial case. I guess the sealed letter disputed the request for a sur-reply by Chanbond. Judge Andrews is going to allow it. Seems their argument was weak, that it would just be a rehash. Considering the judge allowed the stunt the 13 pulled at the end of expert discovery, I can't see how he could deny Chanbond's request. Besides, it's not like they don't have plenty of time now anyhow, while they wait for the Cisco appeal and the justices' opinion. This case is just going to go on and on and on and on...
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
