Replies to post #69968 on UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[Goodbuddy4863]

I was referring to this one:

DillytheKid mentioned Cisco:

Cisco:

Response to notice of oral argument from the Appellee Cisco Systems, Inc

https://drive.google.com/file/d/10GDa5dimRuLPnLuoSgstS1r6SX8MUKgx/view?usp=drivesdk
_________________________________________________________

Thanks for explaining the second URL Link!

But in retrospect both Links only mentioned Cisco:

Response to notice of oral argument from the Appellant ChanBond, LLC. [620946] [18-1886] [Robert Whitman]

https://drive.google.com/file/d/10IWRY6b19vS9QcXF2O1nH437posiNN4w/view?usp=drivesdk

______________________________________________

Wonder why it said CISCO??

[AllinFun]

The comical part is that the 13 literally pulled something out of their ass very last minute outside of their allotted time to shuffle a new arguing point in at end of expert discovery. Then have the balls to say that Chanbond should not be allowed to reply lol. These 13 defendants lawyers are like little kids and the judge actually gives them the time of day smh.