Replies to post #200320 on Amarin Corp Plc (AMRN)

[ilovetech]

JL, I appreciate your healthy degree of skepticism. I think you can let this one go, as I'm not here to beat bro's chest for him. The reference was made in the context of illustrating, that not all practitioners are cut from the same cloth. I used V as an example, because it's relevant to the board, rather than bore the community about his publications and milestones that have far greater meaning.

I haven't forgotten when the board lit up and I'm paraphrasing here: "It's impossible for a company to know which doctors wrote what". Well, we recently learned of a third-party data breach which showed what? It bared naked everything from the prescribing doctors to their patients. I'll say this for the last time for the record: Amarin had contacted bro to tell him he was the first. Honestly, he couldn't give a rats ass if he was the first or the last.

ILT

[Whalatane]

JL. Let the record show that you were far out in front of anyone that I read ...on the benefits of lowering CV event risk by taking 4 gms of EPA .
You were the only one in mid 2012 that advised high risk CAD patients to take EPA even if they used the only DS alternative at the time PlusEPA.
I discussed your post in 2012, with several cardiologists at UCSF and all doubted any real benefit and were concerned with a slight increased risk of bleeding .
Two Cardiologists in particular were the Co directors of the UCSF Adult Lipid clinic ( I donated HeFH blood for research ).
They were very skeptical that R-IT would show any benefit... but saw little harm in my taking high doses of EPA .

So ...credit given where credit is deserved . You were right long before anyone else, that I know or read .
Kiwi