IMO - the simplest explanation is that the Aussies want in house data. Three CNS trials in Australia on one unapproved drug. Has that ever happened before?
Me thinks Dr. Missling should set the record straight and clear the confusion regarding various trials and their locations in today's CC.
Three CNS trials in Australia on one unapproved drug. Has that ever happened before?
Im as enthusiastic about the 273 as anyone here but.. if you play by the rules, pay for the trial then one can have a dozen trials in a country? I dont see the AU authorities inviting Anavex to please conduct the trials of an unproven drug in AU because the expectations are so high ... you?