Replies to post #518611 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[bcde]

The Moelis plan complies with guidelines (you will have to prove that it doesn't, and you have yet to do so), is cohesive, and is viable.

Moelis plan is not viable with all its assumptions, optimistic projections and risks involved in raising $225B fresh equity capital with fnf still under lawless conservatorship/4617f, and listed on otc. Please read earlier post by YanksGhost.

Would you mind posting it again, along with reasons why FHFA and Treasury would choose it over Moelis or any other plan?

Gov agencies will not pick any single private plan but they will look for suggestions in plans and then they will present their own plan.

[YanksGhost]

Moelis, in their second visit, informed FHFA of the need for them to engage a financial advisor to help guide the process of recap and release. Obviously even they recognized that their "plan" was little more than a concept for consideration and not some prepackaged and "ready to go" plan that had been fully thought through.

If Moelis, themselves, had no conviction in their ideas being fully fleshed out and ready for implementation, what gives you the confidence to stand behind Moelis as some "be all" finished product? To me, Moelis isn't just not ready for prime time, it isn't even ready to be called worthwhile. It is just ideas put forth by a billionaire fund investor that owns beaucoups JPS stock and wants another big payday like when he shorted the housing market and engorged his income at the expense of foreclosed property owners.

[trunkmonk]

They are not going to use Moelis plan, useless presenting it constantly.