It's a lot to go through so i've still got a lot to read. But so far it's a ton of regurgitated bs that they have already pounded out before in IPR's... Well not them but Cisco/RPX... Those arguments got demolished in the PTAB so I have high confidence that the Judge/Jury will use the standard in our court system for patent infringement to determine their weak arguments. They give a lot of their reasons for the patents to be invalid due to "lack of written descriptions"... If that is the case - why would the PTAB hold up every claim besides 8 in the 822 patent. The PTAB is very strict and lethal to patent holders when it comes to patent infringement cases... This makes me very confident that we have support from a board that commonly destroys patent holders in the IPR process.
Their prior art argument is very weak as it was in the Cisco IPR that got them a small victory with the PTAB. I could see them getting wrecked with this as well in the case but as I said that PTAB has strong precedent in courts these days in regards to patent litigation so maybe it's tough to get any leverage there with the 822.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
