UnifiedOnline Inc fka UOIP

[AllinFun]

It's a lot to go through so i've still got a lot to read. But so far it's a ton of regurgitated bs that they have already pounded out before in IPR's... Well not them but Cisco/RPX... Those arguments got demolished in the PTAB so I have high confidence that the Judge/Jury will use the standard in our court system for patent infringement to determine their weak arguments. They give a lot of their reasons for the patents to be invalid due to "lack of written descriptions"... If that is the case - why would the PTAB hold up every claim besides 8 in the 822 patent. The PTAB is very strict and lethal to patent holders when it comes to patent infringement cases... This makes me very confident that we have support from a board that commonly destroys patent holders in the IPR process.

Their prior art argument is very weak as it was in the Cisco IPR that got them a small victory with the PTAB. I could see them getting wrecked with this as well in the case but as I said that PTAB has strong precedent in courts these days in regards to patent litigation so maybe it's tough to get any leverage there with the 822.