Claims have been invalidated with lesser arguments before. This isn’t SFOR’s to win. They have to go win this. Prior art can be an uphill battle. Hopefully they took the D team lawyers off the case and stuck somebody on who knows what they’re doing. Or.... they may drop the ball again, as they have more often than not in the last 2 years.
I thinks its a toss up ! He says she says .. judge takes consideration on company profile as well ' why do you think sfor kicked it up a notch trying to get more channels since the microsoft case .. shows company expansion and efforts to get their ip licensed ... just holding a patent to prevent others from using without paying doesnt fly with most cases . The company must show its intentions with results