Replies to post #34824 on T M M Inc (TMMI)

[4retire]

As such DFMI was formed and TMM did not then, nor at anytime thereafter, have any rights to DFMI property. That's why one must conclude that when TMM bought DFI in 2012 they were buying the copy of the codec (as TMM states, "the only real asset") that Tom Simpson was ordered to give back to DFMI by the Federal Court in Ventura, CA. in 2002.

TMM knew this, yet did it anyway. In my mind this was done so Cavanaugh could get around his 11/11 letter to the shareholders. One year later TMM filed suit against Dimension. If they had only done a mundane history search, or even asked long time shareholders like me, Jay, smitty or Stewguts, I don't think this would have happened.

[Stewguts]

"In remembering the contract that DFMI signed with Iterated in 9/2000, it was clearly marked that it was an addendum to the March 2000 agreement between Iterated and DFI."

Once again you are referring to an agreement between DFI and Iterated that was based on the rights to the IBM PVS/SGI compressor code specifically. This agreement has nothing to do with the Intel code that was bought and paid for by TMMI to begin with. The addendum you are referring to is based on false pretenses. Once again I reiterate Dimension did not challenge TMMI's ownership of the Intel version during the court proceedings. Gee I wonder why?

OOPS.