Replies to post #140336 on DD Support Board and Research Team

[janice shell]

You can certainly create a different company with the same name, either in a different state or the same state. What you CAN'T do is call up the TA of a revoked Nevada public shell and say the company you just created in another state is the same thing.

[chemist72]

Do you mind if we discuss SIGO/Fife on this board?

Thanks for the link in your last post on the SIGO board. I did a search of Fife's Security Purchase Agreement with SIGO for the word "arbitration" and it came up 142 times. I'm not sure I will or want to read that Exhibit J (Arbitration Provisions) in the SPA as it is quite long and which I probably won't understand most of anyway. Its probably too complex for anyone to summarize in a paragraph or two so I won't expect you to do that (even if you have read and understand it).

In any case, I also found your example of UAHC to be very interesting. I have just begun to analyze UAHC's SEC filings in general, and also with regard to the loan they received from Fife.

In the brief time I have spent, I already am seeing a filing history that "might" be instructive to SIGO shareholders, but which I would like to discuss with you outside of the SIGO board.

I would like to continue this thread once I have collected my thoughts on UAHC vs SIGO and post them here.

If you are interested in continuing this discussion on this board, please reply and let me know.

tia

P.S. Just to let you know, I do not currently own any SIGO shares. If I decide to buy SIGO shares in the future, I'm 99% sure it would be only for a short-term trade, if per chance SIGO comes up with some market moving news. Otherwise, at this point, I would say that my interest in SIGO is purely "academic", i.e., just to gain knowledge that may be useful in a future situation.