I'm not in charge of what is discussed on this board so you are on your own here. I am a little concerned that you might misrepresent what I've said on the SIGO board*** and hope you will be careful in that regard. Any people that might be tempted to respond to you here should be advised that the Note in question referenced some attached warrants but didn't describe the terms of those warrants in any way...including an exercise price. Not disparaging any questions or comments that you might have but pointing out that you might be chasing a ghost.
I think that there's little point in understanding the details of a Note between an Issuer that is plainly well below any reasonable person's definition of investment grade when the terms of the Note are barely decipherable and the lender has the kind of history that this one does.
That said, this board can be a very helpful resource.
*** "In any case, I also found your example of UAHC to be very interesting. I have just begun to analyze UAHC's SEC filings in general, and also with regard to the loan they received from Fife." That was months ago and I didn't use UAHC as an example of a Company that defaulted on Note conversions based on a failure to file. I posted that Fife, who a poster said had been "barred from financing, trading or being an officer in ANY US Public Company", had actually been "barred from association with any investment adviser, with the right to reapply for association after 18 months" and noted that he is actually the current CEO of UAHC. https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=140610037&txt2find=uahc I didn't know that he had extended a loan to that Company. It would be pretty ironic (and funny) to find out that the Company of which he was CEO defaulted on a loan that he made to it based on a failure to maintain current public information. I won't be trying to confirm that.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
