Replies to post #39566 on Bantek Inc (BANT)

[HoldEm777]

Tried to tell them Daytrader. This is much bigger than you or I having an opinion.This is not an axe to grind cause I lost a few bucks when I decided it was to risky to stay in. There is a paper trail a blind man could follow.

[Drugdoctor]

LMAO - NONSENSE - re"honestly DRUS may lose its federal contractor status."

I'm glad I've been adding these cheap shares, as I don't think it's going down to .005's again... GLTY

[TruthFairy222]

Hi DT, seen you around but this seems to be our first interaction. =D

DRUS appears to be lying to investors

Do you have any irrefutable evidence of this?

Also, I really doubt the government, 'the' U.S. government failed to do their DD with their resources, access to professionals of both legal and financial, with information portals and connections we moonlighting performers of due diligence could only imagine, failed to do theirs..

A speculative theory that the U.S. government got into bed with a company that might be involved in fraud. I just don't think so..might be prudent to remember that DRUS and their IR firm are two seperate entities.

They have U.S. contracts rolling in just a couple of days ago!


$DRUS

[Oliverjack]

How are they lying? The only thing I have seen is that they would pay off the remaining notes which they failed to do other than that it seems perfectly honest to me. It's not their fault what the note holders do with the stocks after they are converted. Also shorts are hitting this stock pretty hard they just recover quicker. It's always easier to be a bear lot of people dump when they see a see a small decrease