Ort-Would the court restrict a document based on such a minor format flaw? Probably not... and #52 is "corrected" and still restricted. The court must have good cause to restrict the docket, perhaps giving time for Congressman Palone to submit an Amicus Brief regarding his filing and filing correction that was made AFTER the ITC voted. Just my theory....
I did caution his Office on 10-28-2017 his opinion would likely receive legal scrutiny in court, that's was nice of me giving him all that time to think about his Amicus and also providing him enough time to hire an attorney.
Additionally I suspect the FDA will be noticed they may also like to submit an Amicus, explaining their lack of enforcement of illegal DS labeling.
Perhaps Palone and FDA can get together again and coordinate their statements or the "DS" attorney's can write both the Amicus briefs and Palone & FDA can rubber stamp them. I suspect this was the case with both Palone and FDA ITC filings.
Anyways, "someone" is working on access to read the new #52...it won't remained sealed forever.
BB
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
