News Focus
News Focus
icon url

CEOs

11/06/17 2:06 PM

#74199 RE: jmjjw #74198

'No insider information is needed to make this assessment, as MMEX provided the information, in published form'

Actually, that is the furthest thing from the truth. Only those who are aware of the business plan and existing agreements or potential agreements with inside info are fully aware.

Anything else, as you are constantly proving, is opinion.

That's what makes a market

Mmex
icon url

Lapbid

11/06/17 4:56 PM

#74227 RE: jmjjw #74198

Its hard to believe that Hanks would attempt to build this 10k barrel a day unit if it didn't produce a product. I thought he said he planed on selling diesel for heavy equipment in the
area. I admit I know very little about topping units buts its hard to believe he would get permits and the Major and everybody whom surely know more about it than me have gone along with it? Wouldn't they have called him out on it if there was no economic viability? I don't think they're that stupid .
icon url

Txinvestor1

11/06/17 6:55 PM

#74234 RE: jmjjw #74198

If MMEX was a scam, Hanks would have pushed out the groundbreaking as far as possible. Instead, he scheduled it efficiently, for a date about two weeks after uplisting. Which gives MMEX a nice flexible window of time for the financing PR on a more visible platform.

Also, if MMEX was a scam Hanks wouldn’t have brought his own daughter on-board to handle investor communications. No father would put his daughter in that position if he was “scamming” investors.

IMO everything is progressing according to plan. It’s a great time to be a MMEX long!