News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Jtech

06/06/17 8:27 AM

#167665 RE: DR. EVIL #167664

exactly!!
icon url

Pugilista

06/06/17 8:29 AM

#167666 RE: DR. EVIL #167664

Doesn't look they are going away anytime soon. Injunction being persued is certainly going to make things difficult for infringer. It would be best to settle and get a liscense agreement where royalties are paid. Treble damages is not good!
icon url

learningthetruth

06/06/17 8:43 AM

#167672 RE: DR. EVIL #167664

Yes and they are in deep trouble now; shall we say. ;-)
icon url

4sleddogs

06/06/17 10:02 AM

#167709 RE: DR. EVIL #167664

Strongly agree! "Shows how important the MSFT settlement was" CEO Mark Kay unjustly took a lot of heat about taking half a loaf. Today he irrefutible proved it was better than none. SFOR survived to fight another day in court. It now stands in a position of legal strength. Further settlements or a court victory will validate its patents. That will lead to company growth and make SFOR a very attractive buyout candidate for an outfit like Texas Pacific Group who spun off McAfee with Intel. (You'll recall TPG, SFOR and Intel share the same lawyers, R&G) On Bloomberg a TPG partner stated that this year "We will be acquiring small computer software companies in the cyber defense landscape" Does SFOR meet that criteria once its IP is validated in court? I think it does!
icon url

carusso

06/06/17 2:06 PM

#167825 RE: DR. EVIL #167664

Absolutely!