News Focus
News Focus
icon url

awk

08/06/03 12:09 AM

#3780 RE: alohamart #3778

alohamart: re: Your attempt...

...to come across as an educated Wave specialist has miserably failed in all aspects...

Did you see this post on Gartner Inc.'s Joe Pescatore that you cite in the post I am responding to?


http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=1281782
icon url

Weby

08/06/03 12:11 AM

#3781 RE: alohamart #3778

Alohamart

You might be a little right. You might be a little wrong.

A lttle information is a dangerous thing!

And the wolf came and nobody believed the little boy!

So why is Wave (almost certainly) chairing the Infrastructure Committee of the TCG?

Do you know what a paradigm shift is?

And Who is Intel's security division anyway???

This goose is turning into a swan.

But then I'm a quack!!! At least I was early last week. lol
Weby

icon url

Snackman

08/06/03 12:43 AM

#3786 RE: alohamart #3778

alohamart if you are smart as you think you are I would be shorting the heck out of this stock. Put you money where you mouth is. That's the best way to show your convictions.

Snackman
icon url

aleajactaest

08/06/03 2:17 AM

#3791 RE: alohamart #3778

alohamart, It is perfectly legitimate to be skeptical of Wave's news flow. But to form a useful conclusion, you would need to discount some factors:

First, Intel is part of a multi-industry group defining a new architecture for the PC based around a TPM chip. Their endorsement is clearly valuable in this context.

Second, the Intel release defined a specific timeline for deployment. This speaks of detailed planning underlying the PR, a rollout schedule, and a release that is quite distinct from almost every comparable communication from Wave.

Third, while Wave's deployment may initially be with one line of Intel motherboards, the rate at which Intel cranks these out represents a huge uplift on Wave's current deployment rate (effectively zero). So while, say, a million boards per quarter is not especially significant to Intel, that number is massively important to Wave.

Fourth, the Intel PR raised considerably the level of certainty surrounding Wave's ambitions. More than anything, the price move represents a significant erosion of the risk associated with this investment. Not that risk is absent, just that it is now significantly decreased.

Fifth, the fact that Wave has been working with and demonstrating a product with IBM suggests that there is mutual interest in the functionality - even if that interest may not be entirely equal. It remains to be seen whether IBM grants Wave direct access to its TPM customer lists, but this would not be inconsistent with the statements made thus far.

Skepticism is a pretty easy road to go down. Sometimes it takes you to the place you want to go. Other times, it's just a cast of mind. You may want to think about treating your own skepticism skeptically.



icon url

scorpio_esq

08/06/03 7:34 AM

#3800 RE: alohamart #3778

Comme ce-ci me fatigue....
icon url

Zeev Hed

08/06/03 9:06 AM

#3831 RE: alohamart #3778

Thanks, not too far from where my current thinking is, they have a lot to prove. Yet, as have suggested in an earlier post, until the actuality of shipments comes in, the speculation of what these shipments might be causes unusual volatility, an environment in which my trading style excels. Of course, if they had something substantive, here would be an excellent spot to issue 10 MM additional shares (or convertible debt) to raise $50 MM to assure funding of a major marketing effort and put a little more in R&D. Right now, even if you assume that the technology is flawless and dominant (assumptions that some would contest), they do not have the resources to do anything with it.
icon url

largehedgefund

08/06/03 11:10 AM

#3926 RE: alohamart #3778

That's the best post I've read in a long time.

Very well stated. I couldn't agree more.