If you've got an alternative view of NWBO's science or how we are interpreting the trial info as it is released, by all means yell it out from the rooftop. But this phase5 stuff is trash and your examples don't hold weight. The Phase5 authors said the report should not be construed as fact and that they we profiting from its impact on the stock! Go ahead and believe it if you'd like.
I think any legitimate report should be responded to. However, Phase 5 is not legitimate and should be ignored.
Also and correct me if I am wrong I the disclaimer actually says that they might have either a short or long position not just a short position.
While we can reasonably assume that they are shorting NWBO that allegation is no more or less substantial than anything Phase V said.
Also and correct me if I am wrong, the claims are negotiable in U.K. Courts where libel laws favor the plaintiff something that benefits NWBO, IF the allegations are entirely false.
Regarding P5 being long or short, does it really matter? The point is that they admit they will profit from the report! lol.
Regarding the court system, does that matter when you don't even know who the authors are?! So the P5 authors made all of this hoopla without any evidence at all...and they did it anonymously! They wouldn't even put their names on it. So tell me, how would NWBO file a lawsuit in any court!