RK
Hello.
I didn't say that there was a part of your post that I didn't understand!
What I did do was correct this statement of yours:-
'But nope, no checkpoint inhibitor as of yet. Only mentioned a discussion a year ago. Nothing has become of it'
I referred you to the companies presentation of last month, where it was pointed out that two of the five conclusion points related to CI's.
So, it is still being mentioned, and the door remains open.
A question for you. What do you mean by 'they want to partner'?
Are you referring to the CI manufacturers, or are you referring to NWBO?
How do you know 'they' want to partner? Is this supposition?
Despite what you are implying with comments like 'I wouldn't hold your breath.....over a CI collaboration' I have an open mind about whether it is the right way forward.
I can see pros and cons. At the moment, I am just stating that it remains in the frame, and the fact that it was mentioned by NWBO only 2 or 3 weeks ago indicate that it remains in their thinking.
You have no idea what is going on behind the scenes. There may have been lots of partnership discussions between NWBO and BP. There may have been none. I have my own hypothesis on this.
Yes, of course it's a long road to approval, and yes two therapies will cost more than one. I think I had managed to work that out.
Whoever said it would be easy?!!!