Replies to post #406052 on InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[mickeybritt]

olddog


I was always taught possession is 9/10th's of the law. If you

posess the title to anything no one else is supposed to use it

with out your permission. If you have not granted the chipmaker

the right to use what you possess then explain why you have a

patent and they can up and use the technology what part of the

possession did we miss? Would the chipmaker have to prove the

patent was invalid and be out the money as well as unable to

produce the chip till it was resolved?


Bulldzr I appreciate your suggestion but daamnit I think when one

owns a patent that is a title and no one can confiscate your car

and drive it till you carry them to court. What thee heck is the

difference? If you can't ask for a cease and desist using your

patented technology why are we so dumb as to keep patentning

technology that is worthless according to what is said here.

What right does a patent owner have?


Am I stupid no doubt I am but so far no one has made me understand

I have the title to a patent and any sob in the world can use it

and not have permission. If anyone takes anything from someone

who has a title to it and they are not granted permission to use

it to the best of my knowledge they call that stealing. Go take

a car and see how that winds up. In fact if someone takes your

car you don't have to file a court case to validate the car is

yours and the person that took your car just has to return it

and that's it no criminal charges. To the best of my knowledge

a APB is put out for your car and if they catch the driver they

go to jail. Now I have the title to a patent and all of you are

telling me any of you can use it till I sue and prove the title

our patent office granted me is valid. Heck of a way to do

business and a far cry from what I was taught about stealing.

Why is it with the SEC the old statement of he who sells what

isn't his'n can't deliver goes to prison. Just got to be sure

you deliver if you short or so I am told. I am only asking that

no one make or in anyway profit from my technology till a court

decision renders the patent invalid. If that happens then what

do we need a patent office for that can't validate a patent before

they issue it?





JMO
Mickey