"If forced to arbitrate claims that Plaintiff did not agree to arbitrate before FINRA, Plaintiff will incur significant legal fees and expenses in connection with defending itself against Defendants’ claims, who seek to recover losses totaling almost $500,000."
This seems odd. Ashira Consulting/Kahn initiated arbitration with Finra two months ago. According to COR only one of the defendants had an account with COR but there was never any trading activity associated with the account. The only thing COR did in this case by their reckoning is that they 'simply provided the ministerial services of executing unsolicited trades initiated by its customers completely unrelated to these Defendants' direct investments in VGTel stock through their contracts with third parties.'
If that's the case why would Ashira initiate arbitration with Finra, and why didn't Finra toss the case out for irrelevancy? And now just days before COR's response is due to Finra, they file a lawsuit in CA seeking to block arbitration. So COR files a lawsuit in NE because of issues with the DTCC but doesn't list the DTCC as a defendant, and now files a lawsuit in CA because of issues with Finra but doesn't name Finra as a defendant.
COR seems to be struggling with regulations and oversight.