News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Gantor50

12/13/14 7:57 PM

#34937 RE: Gold_Icon #34934

Well, there has been so much misinformation posted on the internet about IFUS...Pro and Con...that I will wait and see what evidence gets presented.

I am not going to miss the forest for the trees here...

The fact is that after months worth of denials that anybody ever did anything to compete or harm the IFUS business plan, we now find out that former officers removed from the company started their own competing company, possibly before they were even fully removed from IFUS, and possibly even using some of IFUS materials to promote their new company.

That is the big picture and that is what will be litigated as the foundation of the court case. The outcome of that issue will be the first domino from which every other domino will fall.

All the rest of what is written here is just white noise or attempts to distract from the core element to this case. Not directing this statement at you personally, just a general comment.
icon url

martin33

12/13/14 10:03 PM

#34938 RE: Gold_Icon #34934


It will all come out in the courts why he missed the
first payment.

Once the judge sees why, SA can kiss the 250,000 ADIOS.
icon url

all that jazz

12/14/14 8:13 AM

#34943 RE: Gold_Icon #34934

But why did he not have money to pay the first installment?

That is a great question, you should also ask where is the $100,000 cash deposit money for the Mastic Blast™ first production run. Plus an additional $100,000.invested into the Mastic Blast company. MW never produced one financial statement.

Impact Fusion International (PINKSHEETS: IFUS) announced that the Company has received a $100,000 order from its master distributor group, headed by Anthony DeBlase of New Jersey. Mr. DeBlase has agreed to take over the management of Mastic-Blast™ Beverages Inc. and has placed an order with a $100,000 cash deposit for the first production run of Mastic Blast™ Energy Shots.
icon url

Ecomike

12/15/14 2:27 PM

#34970 RE: Gold_Icon #34934

Would you pay a thief, criminal, conspirator, espionage agent and liar that stole customers and company property while being an officer of the company, IFUS-Supreme Energy (JS and Steve Adelstein, now Ex--directors) after catching him red handed?

I think not.

I know I would not have paid him.

Just connect the dots folks, it is pretty clear now what happened.

I am amazed that SA was a director of the company loaning the money while at the same time he was at the company IFUS-Supreme Energy receiving the loan as a director, a clear no-no ethics wise!!!

And now we know he was creating Absorbezz to steal it all from IFUS while making the loan and calling the loan. It does not get any more criminal than that imho.

I will tell you what MW did not do, he did not pay JS the $250,000 JS tried to extort!!! Which may be why JS back stabbed MW?
JS the "Thief of Bagasse"
icon url

Ecomike

12/16/14 2:15 PM

#35004 RE: Gold_Icon #34934


Would you pay a thief, criminal, conspirator, espionage agent and liar that stole customers and company property while being an officer of the company, IFUS-Supreme Energy (JS and Steve Adelstein, now Ex--directors) after catching him red handed?

I think not.

I know I would not have paid him.

Just connect the dots folks, it is pretty clear now what happened.

I am amazed that SA was a director of the company loaning the money while at the same time he was at the company IFUS-Supreme Energy receiving the loan as a director, a clear no-no ethics wise!!!

And now we know he was creating Absorbezz to steal it all from IFUS while making the loan and calling the loan. It does not get any more criminal than that imho.

I will tell you what MW did not do, he did not pay JS the $250,000 JS tried to extort!!! Which may be why JS back stabbed MW?
JS the "Thief of Bagasse"
icon url

Ecomike

12/16/14 2:20 PM

#35008 RE: Gold_Icon #34934

The fact is that after months worth of denials that anybody ever did anything to compete or harm the IFUS business plan, we now find out that former officers removed from the company started their own competing company, possibly before they were even fully removed from IFUS, and possibly even using some of IFUS materials to promote their new company.

That is the big picture and that is what will be litigated as the foundation of the court case. The outcome of that issue will be the first domino from which every other domino will fall.