News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Danny Detail

05/31/03 1:03 PM

#29704 RE: jmspaesq #29701

Joel .. Really can't agree with you at all. My concern is confined to the lobby's strategy and tactics not their objectives. I am also concerned that their agenda for shareholder activism will extend beyond prop 2 which would likely involve further lobbying of institutional investors and the corresponding additional risk of unintended bad consequences. They believe that dilution and the spectre of more insider selling that could result from prop 2 passing far outweigh any motivational, employee recruitment, etc., benefits that might accrue to the company as a result of its passage. I strongly disagree, but I have never doubted that they clearly see their efforts as helping to build shareholder value, not diminish it.


icon url

fordiamonds

05/31/03 1:24 PM

#29709 RE: jmspaesq #29701

jmspaesq,

I disagree that you wrote an unclear post earlier--I followed you perfectly well.

I also followed Danny Detail perfectly well, and upon review, he decided to restate the sentence for clarification.

Perhaps we should limit the board to just one poster, since you appear to have the uncanny ability to know what everone else is thinking.