jmspaeq, I have read every message on this board since its inception, and I know who has said what.
Now instead of changing the subject, let's just look at your reply to me:
"FYI: I was baiting them..." Why? To start an argument? First you deny that you are causing trouble, then you admit that you are trying to find an argument by "baiting" certain people with provacative statements designed to get a less-than-friendly response, then you say it is all the fault of the "YES" camp? I mean, first of all I thought there were only three camps here -- LONGS, SHORTS and those with NO POSITION. We have enough trouble without you and others looking to beat up on fellow LONGS.
"But what the folks behind the PR did was sneaky manipulative underhanded misleading ... I wasn't 'attacking' anyone. Anonymous people can't be 'attacked.'" No they can't, but since you and others have attributed at least partial credit to certain members of this board, you are merely using that statement as a smokescreen for your personal attacks against the people you THINK were involved. Notice I stressed think, because you have no clue as to who really did it.
And you and arth and others can spend all day calling them names and baiting them and mocking them and ridiculing them -- and all you are doing is destroying this board. Not them -- the board.
As for how I will be voting ... well I haven't decided IF I will bother. I truly don't believe it matters, one way or the other. I think a lot of you are just using the subject as an excuse to push your set of agendas, nothing more (and not just you -- it seems to be the current trend here, these days). If I do vote, it really isn't anyones business how I vote. Notice I haven't gone around asking people how they plan to vote or have voted, and I certainly have not been baiting people for a certain response -- and I won't be beating people up with my YES or NO opinions anytime in the forseeable future.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
